当前位置:首页>游戏攻略>正文

根据现有的氧化所有证据

 2021年5月6日,欧盟据欧盟食品安全局(EFSA)消息,重新欧盟食品添加剂和调味剂小组( FAF )重新评估了二氧化钛(titanium dioxide )(E171)作为食品添加剂的评估品添安全性。

根据现有的氧化所有证据,不能排除该添加剂对遗传毒性的钛作担忧,鉴于存在许多不确定性,为食评估小组得出结论,加剂当E171用作食品添加剂时,全性不再被认为是欧盟安全的。部分原文报道如下:
 
  The 重新present opinion deals with an updated safety assessment of the food additive titanium dioxide (E 171) based on new relevant scientific evidence considered by the Panel to be reliable, including data obtained with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and data from an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity (EOGRT) study. Less than 50% of constituent particles by number in E 171 have a minimum external dimension < 100 nm. In addition, the Panel noted that constituent particles < 30 nm amounted to less than 1% of particles by number. The Panel therefore considered that studies with TiO2 NPs < 30 nm were of limited relevance to the safety assessment of E 171. The Panel concluded that although gastrointestinal absorption of TiO2 particles is low, they may accumulate in the body. Studies on general and organ toxicity did not indicate adverse effects with either E 171 up to a dose of 1,000 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day or with TiO2 NPs (> 30 nm) up to the highest dose tested of 100 mg/kg bw per day. No effects on reproductive and developmental toxicity were observed up to a dose of 1,000 mg E 171/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested in the EOGRT study. However, observations of potential immunotoxicity and inflammation with E 171 and potential neurotoxicity with TiO2 NPs, together with the potential induction of aberrant crypt foci with E 171, may indicate adverse effects. With respect to genotoxicity, the Panel concluded that TiO2 particles have the potential to induce DNA strand breaks and chromosomal damage, but not gene mutations. No clear correlation was observed between the physico‐chemical properties of TiO2 particles and the outcome of either in vitro or in vivo genotoxicity assays. A concern for genotoxicity of TiO2 particles that may be present in E 171 could therefore not be ruled out. Several modes of action for the genotoxicity may operate in parallel and the relative contributions of different molecular mechanisms elicited by TiO2 particles are not known. There was uncertainty as to whether a threshold mode of action could be assumed. In addition, a cut‐off value for TiO2 particle size with respect to genotoxicity could not be identified. No appropriately designed study was available to investigate the potential carcinogenic effects of TiO2 NPs. based on all the evidence available, a concern for genotoxicity could not be ruled out, and given the many uncertainties, the Panel concluded that E 171 can no longer be considered as safe when used as a food additive.

资料来源:食品伙伴网。如涉及作品内容、评估品添版权等问题,氧化请与本网联系删除。钛作

相关链接:食品,为食添加剂,加剂二氧化钛

热门标签
友情链接:
玻璃震荡下跌 考验1450支撑,行业资讯浙江杭州发布首批74件重点商标保护名录安徽铜陵义安区多措并举深入推进放心消费创建工作广东食品安全满意度达到80分以上江苏淮安市召开托育合同示范文本评审会开展水果市场专项检查2018年多地基建领域投入资金将发力,行业资讯广州:打击“三无”外卖,整治“三假”直播无机/醇类助剂对阴离子/两性离子表面活性剂性能的影响(二)福建厦门核查处置牛蛙等7批次不合格食品食品中一般成分的检测技术之水分的测定(二)Prada集团或将以15亿欧元收购Versace亟待深度研发应用的健康食品配料—亚麻籽(一)玻璃股: 建筑节能是非常大投入资金亮点,市场研究李想:3月21日将上线智驾焕新版理想MEGA玻璃贴膜为建筑节能降温,市场研究中国玻璃深加工研讨会开始征稿,行业资讯网购食品、航空餐出问题谁担责?这个司法解释守护“舌尖安全”喷洒干燥剂法在苜蓿田间干草调制中的应用备孕前健身饮食推荐表模板食品稳定剂在蔓越莓果汁中的应用研究(一)2020 年黄河三角洲生态补水水文水质特性分析(三)“米扬丽格”美容机构被疑偷梁换柱 “进口鼻”歪成了“国产鼻”奋斗百年路 启航新征程|13600份家庭档案背后的文明力量深圳消委会在线调查  青少年英语教育结果出炉家庭自助助孕方法大介绍卷走消费者巨款后失联 深圳5家预付式消费企业被列入信用“黑名单”啤酒酿造工艺学课程的混合式教学模式研究全国太阳能标准化技术委员会成立,行业资讯玻璃网印正成为举足轻重行业,行业资讯HEYLADS男生女生时尚新装 春日意趣 简洁百搭天津市消协警示:“盛澜国际酒店”应诚信履约依法赔偿备孕必备:鹿胎颗粒的作用、剂量与时间推荐中消协开展女式打底裤、连裤丝袜比较试验 测试样品抗勾丝效果不佳刷到“赚钱”商机? 投资4万余元差点“打水漂”孕妇最佳水果推荐,孕期吃水果的注意事项焦点 Bluestar Alliance战略收购Palm Angels液质联用法同时测定植物饮料中的 3 种防腐剂和 4 种甜味剂(二)四川2020年销售服务投诉增长3.7倍 网络消费和二手车销售成投诉热点江西首例涉不合格大米消费民事公益诉讼案宣判